Showing posts with label thrivable. Show all posts
Showing posts with label thrivable. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

What is a Changemaker? Reflections on Ashoka's EACH Vision and the Changemaker's Campus at #ACW2011


During the second quarter of this year, I had the honor of working with Ashoka Paris and a global team of professional group conversation facilitators in hosting a 3 day set of dynamic dialogues at the first ever Ashoka Changemaker's Campus.  Our theme was building Ashoka's Everyone A CHangemaker or "EACH" Vision.

Months before June's global event, when I had just signed on to help the Paris team and was presenting some ideas for feedback from the rapidly growing Ashoka Belgium group, someone from a local company asked me "but what do you actually mean by the word changemaker?"


I remember winging an answer that most of the room seemed to feel comfortable with at the time, but today - yes, even after helping to organize and attending the Changemaker's Campus in Paris, I am still not 100% sure that my definition of a changemaker is the same as how others in my professional space use it. If I have learned nothing else in my years of exploring the emerging "changemaker space," it's that we tend to have lots of issues with semantics. In the end, that might not be such a bad thing.


Are you a Changemaker? 


Of course you are - even if you're not calling yourself that yet.... and no, you actually don't have to participate in a changemaker campus to be one!


As I see us, we changemakers are a rapidly growing global tribe of hearts with minds who dare to accept and embrace that we actually can have a world where EVERYONE has the means and incentive to contribute to a thrivable human existence on this planet. We are the Blessed Unrest that Paul Hawken writes of - the largest movement in the world that nobody saw coming.


When I close my eyes and allow myself to see the EACH Vision as we embody it now, we are a beautifully gleaming mosaic of social innovators, social entrepreneurs, social investors, social enterprises, social ecosystem builders, socially engaged corporations, community based initiatives, NGOs, Foundations, LC3's, community action networks, government agencies, informed & engaged consumers, philanthropists, volunteers, moms, dads, kids and grandparents ALL OVER THE WORLD who have already decided and who will eventually decide to work together more and more, in big and small ways, to turn the world around, and set our planet's human development on a sustainable course for a thrivable future.


There we were at the Changemaker's Campus. 1000 of us with power networks, ready to reach across sectors and silos and backgrounds to start thinking big about growing the number of changemakers everywhere. We were bankers and policy wonks, practitioners and investors, corporations and consultants, and cutting edge social innovators from every corner of the globe tackling complex human challenges in incredibly exciting ways. We lived on campus at HEC, one of France's most prestigious business schools. We ran into each other to linger over serendipitous conversations in the long halls, outside of state of the art classrooms, where we learned from each other about our collective potential to build a world where the EACH vision could become real. 


The Changemaker's Campus main 2 day "EACH program," with 3 cross-cutting collaboration tracks (which followed a special sectorally themed cluster program), turned out to be a delightfully gooey and messy banana split of an event experience (with drums sprinkled on top!), where the many flavors present worked wonderfully well together.  For three days, we experienced the special magic that happens whenever changemakers gather. Idea sparks flew, mountains moved, foundations were built, and our collective sense of resolve and direction was sharpened. 


There was a collectively intoxicating giddiness in the sudden knowing: 
  • that we are many; 
  • that we are powerful; 
  • that we are very real and growing daily in our reach.
Changemakers are everywhere among us, already playing your parts to make the world a better place in large and small ways - many of us only beginning to understand the power of the impact we can have on the world with our personal choices about how we spend our time and money. Some of us are driving change from within the towers of industry, some of us are generous in helping out with crowdfunding and online votes for projects our friends send us links to. Some of us are driving innovation from within communities of likeminded people; some among us will influence new national policies, and millions of others of us are influencing the economy through spending habits that we are increasingly linking to the kind of impact we want our households to make in the world. 

Ashoka's Founder, Bill Drayton, proposes that teaching empathy in elementary schools would create a next generation of changemakers that would really kick the building of a more peaceful society into overdrive. I couldn't agree more. But frankly, I also don't think we'll need to wait for those kids to grow up before we start witnessing an intense acceleration of Changemaker activity in the world. I personally sense that the most important "big thing" we must begin doing together is to work harder at measuring and showing the collective impact of the (billions?) of Changemaker actions that are now happening 24/7, all over the planet.


My call to all of us is what are we all measuring, and what can we start measuring together? Which indicators, which targets, which micro-level actions and trends can growing groups of us commit to measuring together, in ways that can help all of us more clearly see and understand the new world that is emerging through our collective actions?  How wonderful it would be if we could figure out how to use our networks of networks to build bridges to a shared new perspective on what our unique pieces of the global change puzzle look like, when we are able to look at them together. 


Co-creating a world where Everyone is a Changemaker involves all of us who believe in a better world taking a frank look inward, at our own personal values and potential value to society, and making choices in our lives that reflect the kind of human beings we want to be, and the kind of change in the global human condition that we want to be a part of.  It is up to each of us, the world's people who choose to work and buy and invest in the part of society that believes in the betterment of humanity, to build our own bridges to a thriving new reality, and personally choose to walk over them. 


Finding your own comfort zone within the Everyone A Changemaker vision is a transcendence of all political dogma; it's not a passing new age fad. It's about choosing to identify yourself with the growing global tribe that knows the world’s best kept secret: that alongside the armageddon of crumbling global economic and political systems we all see in the news lately, other kinds of widespread positive change in the human condition are possible and increasingly real today, thanks to the growing millions of individuals, families, organizations and institutions that are engaging in new kinds of dynamic alliances across silos, across boundaries, and across dogma to co-create it. The world we are building holds empathy for the human condition at it’s core.


There is hope. 


Look around you, people. See the bridges to a more just society around you everywhere, and choose to walk into the reality of building and being the better world you believe in. We changemakers are the anti-conspiracy movement that’s opening up new possibilities for each and every person on the planet to thrive, in an inclusive, cooperative and a thriving world. 


Trust me, even if reading this blog post is the first time you’ve ever thought of yourself as a changemaker in whatever position life finds you, I can assure you it won’t be the last time in your lifetime that you will be called upon to reflect on the impact you can make in building a better world. We are taking over the world's leading business schools. We are infiltrating old institutions and (not so covertly) co-creating some new ones. We are sons and daughters, sisters and brothers, parents and grandparents from all over the world who are embracing this life’s large and small opportunities to redress local and global imbalances.  


Surely if you have access to the information today that leads you to this post, you are already  powerful beyond measure in what you know you can do with a few simple searches or clicks to support your favorite cause, social action or concern. What I guess I’m really saying Paris gave me is a certainty that more of those kinds of easy choices, on many levels in our lives, are yet to come. Changemakers at all levels of society are conspiring to create a world where all of us doing our part is as easy and natural as breathing.  If you don’t think you are a changemaker yet, you will be... we are making sure of that :-)  


#gratitude to Ashoka for allowing me to play such an active role in thinking through HOW to host the amazing event that the Changemaker’s Campus became, and to the amazing group of facilitators who lived up to the trust I place in them to help make the event "anything but a conference." I loved the experience and feel transformed in my thinking about my own potential value as a Changemaker because of it.


Feeling inspired? Share this post with some budding changemakers in your life and pass the positive energy along :-)

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

#cosi10 - Evolutionizing Collaboration (virtual co-creation transcript)

The following is the transcript of an **AMAZING** virtual planning session with cosi10 hosts on Monday 9 August, using the group text-chat function on skype. I borrowed this format from the session I facilitated at Radical Real Time, and with very satisfactory results. The extraordinary level of energy in the conversation was really exciting to be a part of, and the collaborative output was top-notch!
Thank you and KUDOS to all of the cosi10 event hosts who participated across timezones from around the world: Pallavi Keshri (India), Christian Vanizette (Paris), Danielle Lanyard (New York), Matt Nathan (Denver), Jean Russell (Chicago), and Mark Grimes (USA). I coordinated the the chat around a framework of questions related to press release messaging that consultant Bonnie Koenig helped to develop. 
The cosi10 event hosts in Australia, Africa and Brussels weren't able to make it, but hats off to Pallavi India for staying up late to remind us all about how important it is to strategically level the playing field in the social innovation space.
During the chat we got to the core of our messaging strategy by exploring two headline topics for press releases that are now to be written: 
  • Connecting a global sector, and
  • Are you building a better world through innovative entrepreneurship?
A tip if you ever want to try something similar: key to making this virtual collaboration format work was having paste-ready text prepared in advance. I then invited everyone into a group IM chat on skype - as you can see at the end, Australia was eventually able to see what had happened. What I love about using text chat instead of voice for this purpose is the rich archive we are left with that captures the group's globally collaborative thought process.
More virtual co-creation sessions are planned leading up to the kick-off of the cosi10 webbed event series experiment in September, and I am so excited about continuing to work with this wonderful group of likeminds. If this level of energy is what's coming together to make Connecting Social Innovation 2010 happen, I have a feeling we're all in for a heck of a transformative experience between now and December! 
Enjoy ~

Who and How: toward co-creating cosi10 messaging strategies
---------

[09/08/10 19:11:20] Christina Jordan: Just a friendly reminder that today's important skype chat about cosi10 messaging & promotion will happen at:

1pm Portland/LA

2pm Denver

3pm Chicago

4pm New York

8pm Bamako

9pm Edinburgh

10pm Brussels/Paris

1:30am New Delhi

6am Australia

If you are not able to join us, hopefully you will be able to see the transcript here later of the chat between those who did.

Please share these instructions with any others you would like to involve:

"To join the chat, connect with christina_jordan (Brussels, Belgium) on skype between now and then to let her know you'd like to join the cosi10 chat, and she will add you into the chat group."

See you then!

Christina

[09/08/10 19:17:55] Christina Jordan: http://www.ned.com/group/cosi/ws/pressreleases/

[09/08/10 22:00:50] Christina Jordan: Hey folks - Not seeing many in the group online yet but HELLO to those who are here!

[09/08/10 22:01:12] tahitian_coconut: hello ! :)

[09/08/10 22:01:24] Pallavi Keshri: Right here

[09/08/10 22:02:18] Danielle Lanyard: hello

[09/08/10 22:02:48] Danielle Lanyard: (sun)

[01:33:40] Christina Jordan: Hi everyone!

welcome to our first cosi10 virtual planning chat.

So glad some of you could make it!

Maybe those of you online could introduce yourselves briefly to each other.

WHO ARE YOU, and

WHERE ARE YOU involved with hosting a cosi10 event?

[01:34:54] Pallavi Keshri: Hi everybody! I am Pallavi founder for eyaas.com. I am hosting Cosi in Delhi, India

[01:35:38] tahitian_coconut: hello my name is christian, we are creating a web-app for social entrepreneurs http://www.makesense.org and want to organize a cosi event in Paris

[01:36:16] Danielle Lanyard: Hi All. Danielle Lanyard here. In New York City. I am a serial entrepreneur, founder of Travelcology and Third Rail Ventures, which is hosting the cosi NYC event. hey christina christian and pallavi!

[01:36:46] Pallavi Keshri: Hey Danielle... Great to meet you

[01:37:02] Pallavi Keshri: Christian... Are you making any Tahitian Coffee?

[01:37:32] tahitian_coconut: not right now :) Helle Danielle, nice to meet you

[01:37:48] Christina Jordan: I think Bonnie is here too somewhere....

[01:39:00] Christina Jordan: bonnie if you see this try typing something in here

[01:40:52] Christina Jordan: and matt nathan from denver is finding his way here too

[01:41:31] Danielle Lanyard: here. some entertainment. underground skype emoticons: mooning

[01:41:38] Christina Jordan: LOL

[01:41:39] Danielle Lanyard: drunk (drunk)

[01:41:52] Pallavi Keshri: hahaha... (finger)

[01:41:55] Christina Jordan: Matt and Bonnie are you with us yet?

[01:42:14] Danielle Lanyard: last one: is that too much information? TMI (TMI)

[01:42:27] Pallavi Keshri: Mooning is my fav. ...lol

[01:42:28] Bonnie Koenig: Hello everyone. I am here now. Bonnie Koenig. Consultant to NGOs on international engagement. Helping Christina with Cosi10 organizing.

[01:42:53] Matt Nathan: Hi! Matt Nathan, social venture strategist/catalyst, Ashoka's Youth Venture and Change Your City initiative, member of w1sd0m. I'm in Denver, Colorado, USA -- cosi10 host here for Sept.

[01:42:56] Pallavi Keshri: Hi Bonnie. Connected with you on Twitter. This is Pallavi from Eyaas

[01:43:04] Christina Jordan: Yay! It's so great to see you all. Thanks so much for being online at this hour!

Could you all just type in WHAT TIME IS IT IN YOUR PART OF THE WORLD NOW?

[01:43:21] Pallavi Keshri: Hahaha... It is 1.45 AM India Time

[01:43:29] Danielle Lanyard: nyc. 4pm.

[01:43:41] Matt Nathan: Denver, 2pm

[01:43:48] Bonnie Koenig: Yes, Pallavi, nice to see you here as well as Twitter!

[01:44:11] Mark Grimes: Mark from Portland, Oregon 1:00PM

[01:44:12] tahitian_coconut: paris 10 PM

[01:44:12] Bonnie Koenig: I'm one of the lucky ones, also 'business hours' here - 4:00 p.m. in Vermont

[01:44:21] Matt Nathan: Pallavi wins the dedication award!

[01:44:33] Christina Jordan: just after 10pm here in Brussels - hats off to Pallavi!

[01:44:34] Pallavi Keshri: LEts talk again on Sept 13th.

[01:44:38] Christina Jordan: Wonderful!

It's been such a pleasure to get to know some of you over the past couple of months. I hope that these cross-timezone sessions can encourage us all to appreciate and understand each other's richness even more, as we lead up to the cosi10 events.

DISCLAIMER - this is the first time we're doing this so of course the format remains open to refinement. Depending on how many of us show up online at this hour, we might end up inviting discussion to linger over 24 hours instead of an hour…

We're NOT going to attempt to chat by voice tonight, as Skype (and other tools) just aren't as stable for voice as they need to be to make that happen smoothly.

Everyone ok so far??

[01:45:29] Pallavi Keshri: On board!

[01:45:33] tahitian_coconut: on board :)

[01:45:51] Bonnie Koenig: Yes, so far, so good :)

[01:45:51] Danielle Lanyard: this sounds good, though i must mention, i've heard great things about www.tinychat.com - used by open source developers for real time video collaboration around the world

[01:46:12] Christina Jordan: Great!

The OBJECTIVE of tonight's chat is to work together on some "wordsmithing" that can hopefully help all of us to convey the cosi10 concepts in our local/regional environments.

As we all know, the language around social innovation and social entrepreneurship is often ambiguous. On top of that, the cosi10 event concept is new.

Luckily, Bonnie has helped to develop a framework for us to think about the shape of some promotional press release messaging. (Thanks Bonnie!)

The basic idea here is that I'll post some questions and you type the answer that comes to your head, based on what YOU think/imagine the cosi10 event series can be.

In other words, there is no right or wrong answer… this is an exercise in harvesting collective wisdom about the words we use :)

Ready?

[01:46:17] Matt Nathan: Yes, and thanks for your leadership, Christina. Visionary + practical + empathetic = gr8

[01:46:34] Christina Jordan: interesting Danielle - thx for the link. Will check it out!

[01:46:53] Danielle Lanyard: and i'd retweet Matt's comment if i could! :) thanx christina!!

[01:47:17] Pallavi Keshri: SO far so good! I agree with Matt! Great work getting us altogether Christina

[01:47:17] Bonnie Koenig: +1 RT - Big thanks to Christina!

[01:47:25] Christina Jordan: aw thanks guys :*

Headline topic 1: Connecting an emerging global sector
------------------

[01:47:50] Christina Jordan: OK here goes...

Proposed Headline topic 1:

"Connecting an emerging global sector"

PLEASE TYPE THE FIRST WORD THAT COMES TO YOUR MIND NOW

[01:48:09] tahitian_coconut: twitter

[01:48:49] Pallavi Keshri: Cosi

[01:48:57] Jean M Russell: just landed at a place with wifi... waves hello

[01:49:10] Pallavi Keshri: Hello Jean. Welcome

[01:49:13] Christina Jordan: hello Jean! Welcome!

[01:49:17] Danielle Lanyard: hi jean!

[01:49:21] Matt Nathan: hey Jean!

[01:49:23] Bonnie Koenig: Creating systems, processes, forums that allow for meaningful connections

[01:49:30] Jean M Russell: global brain

[01:49:35] Danielle Lanyard: deep ecology

[01:49:52] tahitian_coconut: Hello Jean :)

[01:50:18] Christina Jordan: Danielle what does deep ecology mean to you in the cosi10 context?

[01:50:33] Matt Nathan: Christina, pls clarify the direction we're springboarding toward, eg this is about messaging, right?

[01:50:54] Christina Jordan: yes Matt - sorry if that was unclear

[01:51:07] Danielle Lanyard: taking tenets of ecological frameworks and infusing them into community foundations. more than biomimicry, but actual whole systems theory, for enterprise and innovation - put into action. breathe.

[01:51:08] Christina Jordan: we're aiming at creating the input for some press release writers to work with

[01:51:16] Christina Jordan: they have asked for broad outlines and bullet points

[01:51:30] Christina Jordan: there's a briefing on ned at http://www.ned.com/group/cosi/ws/pressreleases/

[01:51:57] Pallavi Keshri: knowledge sharing

[01:52:43] Matt Nathan: OK, here's mine:
Connecting an emerging global sector to strengthen and accelerate new solutions.

[01:53:24] Christina Jordan: Great - good stuff!

Now, in YOUR words, Who is the emerging sector you hope to connect at your cosi10 event?

[01:53:38] Pallavi Keshri: Social Enterprises

[01:53:52] tahitian_coconut: Social Innovators

[01:54:22] Jean M Russell: Social innovators. :)

[01:54:25] Danielle Lanyard: 'we' are the emerging sector. the 'we' is now open to all how seek to improve their world and others through innovation and hopefully collaboration.

[01:54:53] tahitian_coconut: +1

[01:55:03] Matt Nathan: Changemakers (Ashoka's term, but catching on more broadly - useful in that it can include all across the spectrum...)

[01:55:05] Danielle Lanyard: in nyc, we have killed previously beautiful terms like 'green', 'organic', 'social enterpreneur' due to who have used them. probably very different in different regions.

[01:55:19] Christina Jordan: are SOCIAL ENTERPRISES and SOCIAL INNOVATORS different groups?

[01:55:35] Matt Nathan: Yes, social innovator is broader

[01:56:01] tahitian_coconut: same as Matt, Social Innovator is broader with experiments etc

[01:56:03] Jean M Russell: agreed Matt

[01:56:07] Mark Grimes: Wish to connect social entrepreneurs, enterprises and innovators building scalable, replicable and sustainable market driven solutions that will grow to impact over one million people and one million dollars in revenue in under five years.

[01:56:17] Matt Nathan: social enterprise is a sub-set of social innovation, and can in many instances be quite a narrow slice

[01:56:25] Christina Jordan: Danielle, yes I have learned there are definitely regional variances! How does the "we" in NYC describe itself?

[01:56:40] Jean M Russell: (y) Mark

[01:56:45] Danielle Lanyard: it doesn't. there is no unity here, to be honest. this is why i am so looking forward to cosi!!!

[01:56:52] Jean M Russell: although I am not a fan of scalable

[01:56:59] Jean M Russell: not everything needs to be scalable

[01:57:02] Pallavi Keshri: +1 Jean

[01:57:07] Pallavi Keshri: I agree with that

[01:57:17] Danielle Lanyard: jean, i agree. most social innovation does not need to be scalable to see it's mission realized. most social enterprise, different story

[01:57:43] Jean M Russell: right, but other than that, I really Love Mark's language

[01:58:02] Pallavi Keshri: Even a social enterprise, as long as it is serving the purpose of its existence within the community it is serving

[01:58:03] Mark Grimes: Personally interested in scale as to growth towards overall larger impact

[01:58:18] Danielle Lanyard: Mark, also really like your language. where are you located?

[01:58:28] Pallavi Keshri: A social enterprise can be replicable... it need not be scalable.
[01:58:36] Christina Jordan: Terrific - and remember, we don't need to achieve consensus here... the main thing is to understand the words that we can use to be effective in drawing participants to the events.

ok, so THINK PRESS RELEASE: What's creative about how cosi20 is connecting the sector?

[01:58:46] Jean M Russell: scale can be one org growing in size - but sector scale can be achieved through many orgs, none scaled up, just well connected

[01:58:48] Christina Jordan: oops *cosi10

[01:58:53] Danielle Lanyard: time machine!!

[01:58:54] Mark Grimes: Portland, Oregon (in Nairobi for Maker Faire Africa in two weeks)

[01:58:55] Jean M Russell: which is what this is for - to connect together and inspire

[01:59:04] Bonnie Koenig: For those not familar with your definition of social entrepreneur or social innovator how will they know you are targeting them?

[01:59:05] Pallavi Keshri: +1 jean

[01:59:18] Mark Grimes: and thank you Danielle

[01:59:29] Pallavi Keshri: With Jean on this... I think with Cosi10 we are talking sector scalability

[01:59:35] Matt Nathan: Mark, I like that AND what if cosi10 helped someone launch a key innovation that was policy driven or donation driven (not market driven) YET IT WORKED? I'd like us to be open to whatever works and can scale!

[01:59:57] Pallavi Keshri: and we can describe the sector as Social Innovation to incorporate all definitions including social enterprise

[02:00:07] Jean M Russell: Thank you Pallavi

[02:00:24] Matt Nathan: oops, sorry I fell behind - was referring to something Mark said upthread.

[02:00:37] Christina Jordan: no worries Matt!

[02:00:41] tahitian_coconut: For me what is creative about the COSI10 event is that it is experimenting a way to connect people worldwide at the same moment on the same problematic using collective intelligence mixed with information technologies

[02:00:51] Christina Jordan: repeating: THINK PRESS RELEASE: What's creative about how cosi10 is connecting the sector?

[02:01:36] Mark Grimes: Matt, for me (personally) policy stuff is too wanky, and donation stuff is too focused on the money, not the results. But heck, I’ll offer any assistance I can to anyone trying to make the world a better place.

[02:01:50] Christina Jordan: same moment, same problematic, collective intelligence + info technologies. Nice set of words Christian

[02:02:19 | Edited 02:03:41] Jean M Russell: there are several hurdles to the network of innovators flowing smoothly - innovating and collaborating. 1 is being connected together strong enough to remember each other and have enough trust to reach other. and #2 is that the network of this sector starts to function with some intelligence. that is dependent on us (at least regionally) speaking some of the same language. the COSI event helps with #1 and 2

[02:03:56] Pallavi Keshri: Just a voice from the other side of the world... Christian you might be able to throw some light on this.... I think with Cosi10, the whole social innovation space is allowing the world to become equal. It is allowing people across the development spectrum to speak on the same platform from their own perspectives and channelize global wisdom

[02:03:57] Danielle Lanyard: big thing here is how to make space for everyone, from all different fields, and how to really support each other. support of the network, knowing that differs by region, innovation, etc. - this is what i see making cosi different

[02:04:45] Matt Nathan: what's creative about cosi10:
-- Connecting grassroots to global
-- experimenting to mix in-person & online collaboration in new ways
-- forwarding real work from event to event around the world, innovating and strengthening it as we go
-- outcomes will be co-produced and decided via global participation

[02:05:17] Matt Nathan: (y) Danielle

[02:05:18] Jean M Russell: high functioning coordinated bottom's up approach.

[02:05:24] Christina Jordan: You folks rock! (dance)

Another important question:

What ‘VALUE ADDED’ do you think PARTICIPANTS will gain by being part of this event and network?

[02:06:42] Matt Nathan: Build real working relationships locally/globally that will carry forward in mutual support toward shared goals.

[02:07:27] Christina Jordan: (handshake)

[02:07:28] Pallavi Keshri: Said it right Danielle. How to really support each other, knowing what differs by region

[02:08:10] Matt Nathan: Also perhaps key point: some amazing local innovators/innovations will likely DISCOVERED and showcased / connected up globally.

[02:08:12] Jean M Russell: opportunity for new or expanded relationships with people working on similar things or with a similar purpose
find social support for your efforts
learn what is going on around your effort
co-create the future of the sector

[02:08:13] Danielle Lanyard: value adds could be answers/solutions to how regions can be value add to people and vice versa - in the social innovation space. localized innovation with global support, input and collaboration.

[02:08:34] Jean M Russell: visibility ;)

[02:08:55] tahitian_coconut: mmm i think the added value each participatn would have is the collective intelligence shared worldwide , a reputation beginning on a global network , an action trigger for the projects of the participants

[02:09:00] Mark Grimes: what do participants want?

[02:09:50] Danielle Lanyard: in nyc, we need to innovate because our city is truly on its last legs. were it not for tourist money...the startup and innovation boom here is driven by genuine need. is it similar in other cities?

[02:10:01] Jean M Russell: get what you want and give what you have event.

[02:10:13] Christina Jordan: ;) Mark, my question was initially worded as what do you think participants want to gain... want to give a stab at answering?

[02:10:32] Christina Jordan: (I changed the wording at the last minute!)

[02:12:26] Jean M Russell: (my daughter insists that I say something to all of you now that I explained who I am talking to and why. Waves from Zoe Anne)

[02:13:01] Christina Jordan: LOL Hi Zoe Anne! (hug)

ok one last question on "Connecting an emerging global sector" as a headline topic:

In a word or 2, what's the really sexy part of cosi10 - to you?

[02:13:07] Matt Nathan: (Waving back)

Participants want to gain:

-- support in all forms

-- better understanding of big picture / movement and where/how they can best contribute

-- energy and connection to sustain themselves in their efforts

-- feedback and learning to be more effective

[02:13:23] tahitian_coconut: I think they also want TED stuff....not sure they could all be open to collaborative approaches only, perhaps they might think that it s too disruptive as a conference format.... just a tought

[02:13:36] Pallavi Keshri: BIG WAVES Zoe Anne!

[02:13:43] Mark Grimes: Participants at Maker Faire Africa want increased product distribution, marketing education, access to investment capital, exploration of business partnerships

[02:14:10] Jean M Russell: hi Christina and Pallavi from zoe (hug) (F)

[02:14:16] Jean M Russell: hi Matt

[02:14:20] Danielle Lanyard: oh. lovely people, & zoe, speaking of TED. i just found out TED EAST is held on November 5th, the first day of the Nov. cosi events. can i have your feedback on this?

[02:14:39] Christina Jordan: That's one of the reasons why the hosts design one 1/2 day session Christian!

[02:14:44] Pallavi Keshri: The SEXY... Children and THAT WORD In the same breath...puff..... Now that I have used it, the sexy bit about Cosi10 is that it allows you to break through to the global community from a local perspective

[02:14:55] Jean M Russell: what makes COSI sexy is the AMAZING people involved with a track record of innovation

[02:15:08] Matt Nathan: Sexy part: taking collaboration to the next level, to work on innovative solutions together from grassroots to global

[02:15:26] Jean M Russell: globally networked, locally active and locally led

[02:15:51] tahitian_coconut: @christina roger that :)

[02:15:57] Christina Jordan: Wow! powerful stuff (clap)

[02:15:59] Danielle Lanyard: is cosi NYC still sexy if it's date conflicts with TED East on Nov 5th? sorry to be annoying, but would like your input on if u all think this matters.

[02:16:40] Matt Nathan: Also: it's a grand experiment to work across distance and difference to save the world!

[02:16:45] tahitian_coconut: sexy part : feeling of being part of the same movie

[02:17:05] Christina Jordan: Danielle - one of the organizers of TED in Phnom Penn (sp?) is wondering if it might be possible to deliberately plan cosi10 alongside their Ted event... it's still in my inbox from last week to explore
[02:17:11] Christina Jordan: lets talk later?
[02:17:19] Jean M Russell: I wouln't worry about it too much Danielle. In places like NYC and SF, there are always several events to choose from. People who want to be active come to COSI and people who want to passive hear inspiring stuff go to TED

[02:17:22] Matt Nathan: Also: taking action together, not just another talk-fest.

[02:17:25] Danielle Lanyard: yes. i'm game. i just found out on friday and was waiting to tlak to you all about it

[02:17:33] Danielle Lanyard: jean. word :))

[02:17:34] Pallavi Keshri: LOL!!! Jean

[02:18:15] tahitian_coconut: agree with jean :)

[02:18:36] Christina Jordan: WOW WOW ok this is great stuff. I'm going to work from the above to give the press release writers some quotes and bullet points from you all.

Can we try to quickly do another one please?

[02:18:36] Jean M Russell: in fact, I think it helps remind of us of part of our edge to push in our marketing

[02:18:46] Jean M Russell: yes

[02:18:51] Christina Jordan: +1 Jean

[02:19:08] Jean M Russell: really enjoying the interchange with everyone. All have great comments

[02:19:48] Jean M Russell: #gratitude. so glad I was able to get online in time to catch some of this.

[02:19:51] Matt Nathan: Thanks all -- honored to be in this with you!

[02:20:31] Danielle Lanyard: i think cosi and TED have a shared ethos, but cosi is all inclusive, grassroots, globally connected, but localized - and intended to disrupt...but not from an individual voice, but from all our voices at the global roundtable.

[02:20:38] Pallavi Keshri: Good one Christina. Helps to hear wha I can say to people to come to us

Headline Topic 2: Are you building a better world through innovative entrepreneurship?
--------------------

[02:20:39] Christina Jordan: Headline Topic 2.
Are you building a better world through innovative entrepreneurship?


Headline Topic 3.
Social innovators band together to shape the coming decade


Headline Topic 4.
Many timezones, many cultures, many plans for a better world

PLEASE TYPE THE NUMBER OF THE TOPIC YOU'D LIKE TO EXPLORE IN OUR REMAINING TIME

[02:21:08] Bonnie Koenig: Danielle - that's great language "intendedto disrupt", now that's different!

[02:21:12] Jean M Russell: #3

[02:21:18] Christina Jordan: THAT'S WHAT I WAS HOPING WE'D ALL GET OUT OF THIS PALLAVI. JEAN THX FOR GOING THE EXTRA MILE TO BE HERE!

[02:21:18] Pallavi Keshri: #3

[02:21:47] Danielle Lanyard: topic 2. why innovate, if not to disrupt the complacent fabric to bring about needed change.

[02:21:54] Christina Jordan: oops sorry for shouting (chuckle)

[02:21:55] Jean M Russell: We all made it a point to be here....I just got gliched noticably.

[02:22:01] Mark Grimes: #2

[02:22:17] Danielle Lanyard: is gliched a hybrid of glitch and cliche?

[02:22:44] tahitian_coconut: #3

[02:22:45] Pallavi Keshri: hahaha... wonderful learnings... gliched = glitch + cliche

[02:22:53] Jean M Russell: lol

[02:23:23] Jean M Russell: can we talk about #2 or #3 for 5 minutes?

[02:23:48] Pallavi Keshri: I like the whole idea that this is meant for "disruption"

[02:23:49] Matt Nathan: LOL - "gliche" is a keeper. ANd I vote for 2

[02:24:06] Pallavi Keshri: Why innovate IF NOT for Disruption

[02:24:23] Danielle Lanyard: (handshake) to you all!

[02:24:27] Jean M Russell: okay, so what I like about #2 is that it invites the reader to consider whether they are one too.... so I expect to read about what the qualities of an innovator are

[02:24:31] Christina Jordan: I also think number 2 addresses bonnie's earlier question:

[22:29:05] Bonnie Koenig: For those not familar with your definition of social entrepreneur or social innovator how will they know you are targeting them?

[02:24:41] Christina Jordan: ok so...

[02:24:54] Mark Grimes: +10 Pallavi

[02:24:54] Christina Jordan: What is innovative entrepreneurship as we are using the term? (is there a better term that encompasses social enterprise and innovation?)

[02:25:13] Danielle Lanyard: e

[02:25:20] Danielle Lanyard: oops. 'enterprise for social impact'

[02:25:21] Jean M Russell: (what I like about #3 is the decade outlook)... and what I didn't like about #4 is that it sounds scattered

[02:25:35] Pallavi Keshri: Thanks Mark

[02:26:01] Jean M Russell: well entrepreneurship itself is supposed to be innovation, so it sounds a bit redundant, right?

[02:26:03] Danielle Lanyard: also, back to bonnie's question. these terms do have different connotations by region. is there a globally accepted lexicon?

[02:26:54] Christina Jordan: no, danielle, there really isn't. That's why we need to think about all of the terms we are using globally and strategically use them all to our maximum advantage if we can

[02:27:02] Jean M Russell: as far as I have experienced, there isn't a gloabl one Danielle. When I was in Sweden, they really didn't get "social" entrepreneurship... and they spoke to "public" instead

[02:27:06] Pallavi Keshri: I am not so sure about that Jean... Not all entrepreneurship is Innovation...

[02:27:07] Matt Nathan: yes to disruption, AND I think a lot of what's different and promising about cosi10 is that we aim to go BEYOND disruption, to co-construction

[02:27:13] Jean M Russell: and they thought it was a bit obvious...

[02:27:25] Mark Grimes: All great VCs and angel investors are looking for disruptive new business models. And those are the models we should be exploring as well.

[02:27:38] Danielle Lanyard: co creation. love this. 'whats the opposite of war? creation"

[02:27:41] Christina Jordan: nice headline material Matt!

BEyond disruption to co-construction

[02:27:42] Jean M Russell: BINGO Matt. Yes, not just to disrupt, but to erupt with something new

[02:27:52] Jean M Russell: co-creation +10

[02:28:03] Pallavi Keshri: Co-creation is great!

[02:28:40] Christina Jordan: NOT JUST TO DISRUPT BUT TO ERUPT WITH SOMETHING NEW

[02:28:44] Christina Jordan: I like that too.

[02:29:18] tahitian_coconut: Creative commons entrepreneurship, there's a good philosophy of co-construction in the creative common movement

[02:29:22] Pallavi Keshri: Can I throw a spanner in the works??!!! Going to be disruptive

[02:29:38] Jean M Russell: yes, please

[02:29:42] Mark Grimes: not sure what a spanner is, but sure

[02:29:44] Matt Nathan: "entrepreneurship" itself is tinged with Western worship of individualism, Ayn Rand etc. Personally, I think what's most needed is a mode of innovation and production that is still emerging. Bill Drayton talks/writes about "collaborative entrepreneurship"

[02:29:48] Jean M Russell: just no spammers, ok?

[02:29:55] Matt Nathan: spanner = wrench

[02:29:59] Mark Grimes: thnx

[02:30:12] Christina Jordan: LOL - what is it Pallavi dear?

[02:30:25] tahitian_coconut: in france Social Entrepreneurship is perceive as only NGO and associative stuff, nothing to do with business...it's sad

[02:30:26] Pallavi Keshri: LOL:) Ok so what we are essentially talking about is ways of making this world a better place...

[02:30:29] tahitian_coconut: go pallavi :)

[02:30:51] Christina Jordan: Yes - leading to my next question - PLEASE ANSWER: How will innovative entrepreneurship help to build a better world?

[02:30:53] Pallavi Keshri: So if we are talking making people economically stringer so that they become empowered to build themselves a better world

[02:31:09] Pallavi Keshri: Does it all have to be "innovative"..."disruptive" "new"

[02:31:10] Matt Nathan: Funny watching all those little animated pen icons moving at once!

[02:31:12] Bonnie Koenig: Matt - That's important, the more you can break down terms that don't mean the same in all places to more commonly used English terms, the more globally understood they will be.

[02:31:47] Matt Nathan: bonnie, that's part of why I like "changemaking" & "changemaker"

[02:32:11] tahitian_coconut: Innovative Entrepreneurship will help build a better place if they take into account their social impact in their business models

[02:32:22] Christina Jordan: I've always been partial to "Better World Builders"

[02:32:32] Pallavi Keshri: For places like India.... It is important that people get the basics... which could be something simple.. something done before... something "easy"... maybe something which can be copied.

[02:32:33] Jean M Russell: Collaborative entrepreneurship will change the world by (excuse me being such a theory-head) = working at a more complex system level than the problems it addresses. ;)

[02:33:06] Christina Jordan: @pallavi I don't know that "economically" better is the only form of a better world I am personally talking about

[02:33:06] Mark Grimes: +10 Pallavi again

[02:33:06] Danielle Lanyard: i'd like to also throw in global social justice movement lingo. social justic through enterprise and innovation. empowerment

[02:33:47] Mark Grimes: Pallavi, that's why one org I like is Drishtee...biz models in a box for rural India

[02:33:50] Christina Jordan: webbed empowerment = WE

[02:33:51] Pallavi Keshri: Agree Christina, product & service aimed at a better quality of life

[02:34:01] Jean M Russell: +1 Christina

[02:34:08] Christina Jordan: aimed at building a thrivable world

[02:34:09] Pallavi Keshri: unfortunately the discussion on "alternative currency" is still on

[02:34:19] Matt Nathan: Status quo is taking us all to extinction -- so yes, something needs to be NEW. Personally, I think what's need most is PROCESS INNOVATION -- we've got product innovation and it is not enough to get us to thrivability.

[02:34:37] Jean M Russell: agreed Matt

[02:34:39] Danielle Lanyard: jean - there is a big drive here to 'formalize' collaborative innovation so that this can be profitable for the innovators who are freely sharing their brain and ideas to make something great.

[02:34:54] Matt Nathan: (that was in response to Danielle's early Q re whether we need "new"

[02:35:08] Christina Jordan: redefining the currencies that connect us is a huge part of the equation, I think. Can't wait to see what the Brussels event brings on that front

[02:35:42] Pallavi Keshri: Mark, I like Drishtee to

[02:35:46] Matt Nathan: oops I meant Pallavi's Q

[02:35:49] Jean M Russell: i we understand that innovation is risky... and that not all of the process can give rise to income...I am open to formalizing some of the process to help support those doing it.

[02:36:05] Danielle Lanyard: re: redefining currencies: http://www.greenamericaexchange.org/ - is there a global version?

[02:36:06] Mark Grimes: and Honeybee Network in India is GREAT too

[02:36:09] Pallavi Keshri: My point is such organizations in these conditions are far & few... so are we to focus only on those?

[02:36:19] Christina Jordan: GREAT - now.... let's drill down on this:

What ‘value added’ can innovative entrepreneurs expect to gain by being part of this network?

[02:36:55] Jean M Russell: Danielle - if Chris Lindstrom is in NYC this summer... I suggest you meet him (currency guy)

[02:36:57] Christina Jordan: This network that WE (all of us chatting here) are daring to attempt to create.....

[02:37:10] tahitian_coconut: all your remarks make me think about this idea for the press release, cosi is like an attemp to create an Open source operating system for social innovation apps !

[02:37:18] Jean M Russell: and thank you Christina for bringing us together

[02:37:23] Mark Grimes: It seems they would want, more sales, more product distribution, more capital, more social impact

[02:37:30] Pallavi Keshri: So can we then say we are ONLY looking at "innovations" either processes or products or services etc.

[02:37:38] tahitian_coconut: +1 mark concerning the honeybee network, great grassrotts innovators !

[02:37:55] Mark Grimes: thnx TC

[02:38:13] Christina Jordan: projects - even of an experimental nature, should also be in that mix...

[02:38:31] Danielle Lanyard: i think ideas can come to market quicker if they know how they can integrate with other existing technologies, improve in both directions. cosi can bridge this, the world over.

[02:39:01] Danielle Lanyard: jean - can u connect me to chris, if you know him. thx.

[02:39:07] Jean M Russell: sure.

[02:39:10] tahitian_coconut: yes, we should experiments of create workshops where we hacks business models and innovation to give them a bigger social impact

[02:39:17] Pallavi Keshri: Agree Danielle

[02:39:22] Matt Nathan: yes to open source, but I think what we're about here with cosi10 is pre-OS... more exploratory, experimental. Perhaps more like web standards, think early days of Berners-Lee and W3C

[02:39:32] Pallavi Keshri: I think thats a great output

[02:39:42] Mark Grimes: Good one TC!

[02:40:14] Pallavi Keshri: Nice one Christian

[02:40:26] tahitian_coconut: Danielle gives the idea of iteration in innovation +1

[02:40:43] Jean M Russell: I gotta take my kids to their dad... sad to leave you all. Thank you for the amazing chat!

[02:40:53] Mark Grimes: see ya Jean

[02:40:56] Danielle Lanyard: i'd also like to focus on regional resources. NYC has tons of untapped resources that we could share with the world, that we can't even interconnect locally. how to harness this, is a constant question of mine, to raise via cosi 10

[02:40:58] tahitian_coconut: As cosi events happens regularly it's also a place to iterate social innovation to fine tune them event after event

[02:41:01] Danielle Lanyard: bye jean

[02:41:04] Jean M Russell: (wave)

[02:41:05] Pallavi Keshri: Grt stuff Jean.. Thanks for coming by

[02:41:12] Christina Jordan: EXACTLY - that's what I would LOVE the case-study building breakout sessions turn into - hack the business models and rebuild them stronger through the crowdsourced wisdom - refine the plan through the process and then fund the best of in December

[02:41:46] tahitian_coconut: bye jean

[02:41:54] Matt Nathan: Agreed re all the above -- and thanks Jean

[02:42:13] Christina Jordan: nye Jean - thank you SO much for being here, and for adding your talent to the mix

[02:43:31] Matt Nathan: Re experimentation, iteration, meshing efforts and bizmodels locally / globally -- I think it is crucial that we differentiate cosi10 from all the variants of a pitchfest that are burgeoning.

[02:43:59] Pallavi Keshri: yes thats important

[02:44:05] Pallavi Keshri: +1 Matt

[02:44:12] Matt Nathan: Pitchfest approach is mostly atomistic / competitive / one-off

[02:44:31] Matt Nathan: We want holistic / networked / collaborative / ongoing

[02:44:55] tahitian_coconut: ...quantic ! :)

[02:45:18] Christina Jordan: Which leads to my final planned question for this topic:

Which cosi10 activity highlights will excite potential participants the most?

- In-depth conversations about socila impact in the sectors they are reaching
- professional skills exange fora
- the crowdsourced planning/resource matching/financing opportunity
- the networking
- the ......

[02:45:39] Danielle Lanyard: i agree with nathan. pitch fest model uses competition to drive enterpreneurs, but does little to foster innovation

[02:45:50] Christina Jordan: The topic: Are you building a better world through innovative entrepreneurship?

[02:45:53] Bonnie Koenig: I am going to have to sign-off as well. Great skype chat and good to "meet" you all.

[02:45:54] tahitian_coconut: the Hacking Sessions ;)

[02:46:02] Pallavi Keshri: hacking it is

[02:46:07] Pallavi Keshri: +1 TC

[02:46:08] Mark Grimes: See you Bonnie

[02:46:16] tahitian_coconut: see you bonnie

[02:46:16] Christina Jordan: thx for joining us Bonnie! we're wrapping up soon

[02:46:31] Pallavi Keshri: Thanks Bonnie

[02:46:40] Danielle Lanyard: Bye bonnie!!

[02:47:00] Christina Jordan: and THANK YOU for helping to add structure to this process!

[02:47:11] Christina Jordan: Yay Bonnie (clap)

[02:47:27] Pallavi Keshri: (y)

[02:47:35] Matt Nathan: thx Bonnie - great to v-meet you

[02:48:07] tahitian_coconut: (flex) --> bonnie

[02:48:09] Mark Grimes: One challenge, most entrepreneurs don’t know what they don’t know. So it’s hard for many entrepreneurs to then explore the things that are keeping them from getting to their next level

[02:48:25] Mark Grimes: Hacking Session will help them

[02:48:27] Christina Jordan: REPEATING:

Which leads to my final planned question for this topic: Are you building a better world through innovative entrepreneurship?

Which cosi10 activity highlights will excite potential participants the most?

- In-depth conversations about socila impact in the sectors they are reaching
- professional skills exange fora
- the crowdsourced planning/resource matching/financing opportunity
- the networking
- the ......

[02:48:31] Danielle Lanyard: great point mark.

[02:48:58] Mark Grimes: thnx DL

[02:50:16] tahitian_coconut: hacking sessions

[02:50:24] tahitian_coconut: crowdsources ressource planning

[02:50:35] tahitian_coconut: Wow moment when discovering innovations

[02:50:37] Pallavi Keshri: I think #1 & #3 Christina

[02:51:48] Mark Grimes: I agree, #1 and #3

[02:52:06] Danielle Lanyard: i think cosi participants will want something that is a cross between a pitch fest and a fail faire, where they can both incubate, know what they don't know, and still launch/expand/scale - openly, and with local help and a global network

[02:52:34] Christina Jordan: #1 actually excites me the most personally... I think when we can shift our focus to thinking about the impact we are planning - and momentarily away from resource scarcity issues - then suddenly things tend to become much clearer in this field

[02:52:40] Matt Nathan: Yes, Mark -- so we need to emphasize that it is hacking-with-a-purpose, to help them get their own venture to next level, and to move collectively to next level of solutions.

Also, I like "hacking" and it doesn't necessarily resonate with non-techies. "Building" "Experimenting" "Strengthening" are some alternative words...

[02:53:53] Christina Jordan: love the hacking analogy! would like more reasons why that's important - what it can lead to - ....

[02:54:35] Danielle Lanyard: hacking also connotes that you are going to find something you didn't necessarily expect! like the guy who tried to make superglue and hacked his way into inventing ice cream.

[02:54:54] Pallavi Keshri: We will have to be careful with the hacking... though we need it... We should "lead" people into solutions as opposed to "providing" solutions.... could very well be the mentoring that is required

[02:55:09] Mark Grimes: Hiow do I say this without sounding mean. Some business miodels should simply just not launch. Just because the entrepreneur likes their own idea, it still may be, well, not a great idea. All good entrepreneurs understand the demand for their product/service. Heck, myself and 6 people spent a weekend years ago asking if SnapNames was an interesting idea, or an actual business model. We could have decided to kill it

[02:55:50] tahitian_coconut: mmm perhaps not decide to kill it or not but to transform it

[02:55:57] tahitian_coconut: this could lad to a lot of experimentations

[02:56:05] tahitian_coconut: concerning the social impact

[02:56:23] tahitian_coconut: cosi could be a place where we share the lastest research in this field

[02:56:27] Christina Jordan: co-creation is what I'm after

[02:56:44] Pallavi Keshri: and innovations... most entrepreneurs also see the opportunity and should reach for it in terms of modifications to existing plans

[02:57:08] Mark Grimes: We decided it was disruptive and created a secondary market for domain names. Co-creation towards...better, quicker, measurable socail impact?

[02:57:13] Danielle Lanyard: co-creation, yes! and with mark's point that create solve problems, not to impose solutions.

[02:57:13] Christina Jordan: I think we may well be the latest research in this field, of this deep qualitative nature anyway

[02:57:17] tahitian_coconut: evaluating to social impact in different sectors : it's only the beginning of the research , so perhaps cosi10 could be a really cool place for searchers in this field meeting with practitioners

[02:58:15] Christina Jordan: yes, TC

[02:58:28] tahitian_coconut: co-creation / co-piloting / co-evaluating

[02:58:40] Christina Jordan: exactly - I so want what we're able to harvest from cosi10 to be valuable to researchers

[02:58:42] Pallavi Keshri: I am going to keep playing devil's advocate. I apologise for that.... but we have to understand that we are trying to make a LEVEL PLAYING field here..... the distance between the worlds is way too much...some pits have to be filled

[02:59:45] Christina Jordan: PLEASE SPEAK TO PALLAVI'S COMMENT:

How will cosi10 contribute to levelling the playing field?

[03:00:08] Mark Grimes: +10 for one thing (again) to Pallavi

[03:00:18] Matt Nathan: Message to entrepreneurs:
Explore options, get feedback, learn, strengthen your venture -- and connect it with others in practical ways for greater impact.

[03:00:28] Danielle Lanyard: 'enterprise' as vehicle to level the playing field. enterprise as vehicle to bridge divides through empowerment.

[03:00:45] tahitian_coconut: by structuring knowledge

[03:00:49] Pallavi Keshri: Define Enterprise.

[03:00:59] tahitian_coconut: and working with researchers ( answer to pallavi )

[03:01:09] Mark Grimes: Maker Faire Africa is meant to empower local African solutions to local problems with local innovation...we're (the MFA team) is just the organizing body

[03:01:12] Danielle Lanyard: 'innovation' as opposed to enterprise?

[03:01:45] Christina Jordan: needing to wrap up in Brussels soon but (inlove) deeply in love with this conversation

[03:02:13] Mark Grimes: innovation, inventions, amd makers...most of whom are selling something, so enterprise, yes

[03:02:50] Pallavi Keshri: When we say "enterprise" as a vehicle for levelling the field... brings me back to economics...They way I see it the two co-exist... but might be mutually exclusive!

[03:03:17] Christina Jordan: To wrap up on topic 2

PLEASE SPEAK TO PALLAVI'S COMMENT:

How will cosi10 contribute to levelling the playing field?

[03:03:34] Matt Nathan: This is like Maker Faire Global -- aim of cosi10 is to organize fora and processes for makers to learn, connect, sell, collaborate to solve probs

[03:03:46] Mark Grimes: Pallavi, can you ellaborate please?

[03:04:51] Pallavi Keshri: This was in respect to Christina;s earlier comment on how we might lok at economics as the only means of social impact..but in my mind when we speak enterprise as Danielle just mentioned it connotes economics

[03:05:00] Mark Grimes: And what we found wit MFA is some ideas are very local, some regional, and some global...and most people could not really evaluate their own idea (as often happens in US as well)

[03:06:05] Pallavi Keshri: Hence my question... can what is the defining line... Isnt the basis of an enterprise economics? If yes then no questions but if no then how are the two separate from each other

[03:07:22] Christina Jordan: organization = enterprise = venture = idea = level playing field?

[03:07:35] Danielle Lanyard: Pallavi - I think this question is importan to ask for the big picture, but it differs by actual venture. I personally don't work on a venture that isn't aimed to 'level the playing field', and then i ask the questions Mark raises, to as many experts possible. This process, is like an open collaboration, and part of what I'd like to see all ventures do when they are seeding things.

[03:09:11] Pallavi Keshri: @ Mark: With MFA when you assess or evaluate an idea what is the benchmark? global or local?

[03:09:22] Mark Grimes: Nice one Danielle

[03:10:37] Pallavi Keshri: Thanks Danielle. So I would in that sense say anyone who has an idea with respect to levelling the playing field is welcome on board!

[03:11:25] Danielle Lanyard: it seems this great group KNOWS what questions to ask, on how to level the playing and what this looks like. but what of the people who don't know? how can cosi10 be a community to ask? and how does 'levelling the playing field' differ in meaning, globally?

[03:11:45] Christina Jordan: re: "enterprise" economics - i guess at the end of the day, the word we use to describe it is not as important as simply "finding ways to make good things happen." Revenue based, crowdsourced, alternatively jump-started through resource matching and hacking sessions with other smart people... finding innovative ways to make things happen that maybe are neither pure enterprise or charity models

[03:11:54] Mark Grimes: Good question Pallavi. That's exactly what we're doing this year. Last year was to see if innovators, makers and inventors even showed up. This year the team will work closely with all makers to evaluate their "invention" from an overall business model perspective. Helping with milestones, and deliverables for them to get to the next level (assuming, that is what they desire)

[03:12:25] tahitian_coconut: agree with Christina

[03:13:48] Mark Grimes: a very good entrepreneur Paul Graham put it like this...and I love it..."make stuff people want"

[03:14:17] Pallavi Keshri: aaah... thanks Christian.... so then we come down to forms of existence of an organization be it for-profit or non-profit or hybrid 3LCs(???) in the US?... Just wanted to check how we would like to define who participates...

[03:14:35] Pallavi Keshri: Sorry that was Thanks Christina

[03:14:58] tahitian_coconut: perhaps we can focus not on their legal status but on the vision of the entrepreneurs

[03:15:10] Danielle Lanyard: pallavi - people here in NYC want to focus on corporate structuring and 3LCs/finance. will definitely be a focus of the NYC event for sure.

[03:15:10] tahitian_coconut: do they want to tend to a sustainable kind of approach

[03:15:16] Mark Grimes: great point TC

[03:15:32] Pallavi Keshri: Absolutely TC... that point is what I needed... sorry to get to it in such along-winded way

[03:15:41] Christina Jordan: we talked earlier about making sure we remain open to the different interpretations of the terms

[03:15:48] Christina Jordan: whoever shows up is the right people

[03:16:03] Matt Nathan: Here's my mundane response -- not addressing the enterprise definition aspect:

cosi10 helps level playing field by being:
-- open in eligibility and process
-- affordable
-- in-person as well as online (and not dependent on broadband connection)
-- transparent
-- emergent & continuously improved
-- iterative (sufficient time and slow enough pace to be inclusive, help good people / idea / ventures not get lost)
-- facilitated (by a diverse team with knowledge/skill re issues of power/equity etc)

[03:16:25] Mark Grimes: Lately I've suggested to people, start your business under another existing entity, then inorporate LLLC, LLC, s-corp whatever...only after you have $10,000 in sales

[03:17:05] Pallavi Keshri: Thanks for your answer Mark. I asked the question because like you said first it is important that people should show up and then to see what they need

[03:17:16] Mark Grimes: zactly

[03:18:07] Mark Grimes: MFA the first year was not event a registered org, it was just 5 people doing something interesting

[03:18:17] Pallavi Keshri: Got round-up Christina. Thanks a ton people. This might seem like goin back a few steps for you....but I am trying to level the playing field :) Thanks for holding up

[03:18:34] Christina Jordan: Wow - what a bundle of energy this group is. Thank you thank you thank you for all of your input tonight!

(clap)

I will be posting the transcript of this chat in the host backchannel space, and will be sending it to the press release writers

[03:18:48] Christina Jordan: I would also love to post it on the Evolutionize it blog if y'all are agreed.

[03:18:56] tahitian_coconut: agree :)

[03:19:02] Christina Jordan: What a wonderful discussion t's been!

[03:19:03] tahitian_coconut: Thanks a lot everyone

[03:19:06] Pallavi Keshri: Sure Christina...

[03:19:06] Mark Grimes: fine by me

[03:19:31] Danielle Lanyard: yes. thanks to you all. big kudos to christina, and thanks to our mothers for birthing great open minds! :D

[03:19:33] tahitian_coconut: it was cool to talk with you on skype :) it changes from corporate kind of conf call hehe :) thks christina for the animation !

[03:19:41] Christina Jordan: y'all rock, and it thrills me to think about rocking the world just a little bit with you all!

[03:19:41] Pallavi Keshri: Mark, would like to discuss MFA a little bit with you sometime... It might be a format we look at for cosi10 local paticipation

[03:20:00] Christina Jordan: (ninja)

[03:20:09] Matt Nathan: OK, great to think together about what we're trying to help happen with cosi10 -- thanks everyone!

[03:20:09] Mark Grimes: happy to chat

[03:20:23] tahitian_coconut: bye :)

[03:20:26] Pallavi Keshri: Thanks a ton.. whenever conevenient for you....

[03:20:33] Christina Jordan: I'll send out a roundup note first thing in the morning

[03:20:59] Christina Jordan: The next virtual planning session is Thursday - esp important for the September event hosts if you can make it

[03:21:02] Danielle Lanyard: and we all owe pallavi 1 good night's sleep - trooper winner of the group!

[03:21:14] Pallavi Keshri: LOL... I dont think I am sleeping now

[03:21:16] Pallavi Keshri: Its 3.30

[03:21:25] Pallavi Keshri: And am way too charged up to ge any sleep

[03:21:38] Christina Jordan: yes Bravo Pallavi - you deserve a good night's (morning's) sleep!

[03:21:49] Mark Grimes: Sleep deprived = good creative time

[03:22:01] Christina Jordan: Thursday AUGUST 12 - 6am PST | 9am EST | 1pm GMT | 11pm NSW
Introduction to the ned.com platform features & host backchannel space

[03:22:03] Pallavi Keshri: hahaha... I think so... definitely more productive time

[03:22:12] Matt Nathan: We need to level the sleeping field!

[03:22:28] Pallavi Keshri: mmmmmm!!! Go Go Mark!

[03:22:39] Danielle Lanyard: thanks again all. off to level the sleeping playing field bye

[03:22:43] Christina Jordan: http://www.google.com/calendar/render?action=TEMPLATE&tmeid=OHJtMDdmMXAyY2FqMWh0dXJyYXVzNG4wZWMgY2hyaXN0aW5hc3d3d29ybGRAbQ&tmsrc=Y2hyaXN0aW5hc3d3d29ybGRAZ21haWwuY29t&sf=true&output=xml

[03:22:57] Mark Grimes: see everyone

[03:23:04] Christina Jordan: Thank you soooo much to everyone - look for a roundup message from me tomorrow with the links to this transcript

[03:23:13] Matt Nathan: bye

[03:23:17] Christina Jordan: (clap)

[03:23:21] Christina Jordan: (yawn)

[03:23:23] Mark Grimes: thnx all

[03:23:29] Christina Jordan: (F)

[03:23:52] Pallavi Keshri: Good morning everbody! Have a nice day.. .

[03:24:01] Pallavi Keshri: (sun) Cheers!

[03:24:20] Christina Jordan: So very lovely to speak with you all! Bravo to all on a job well done. I feel great about what we accomplished tonight. Kudos!

[03:24:20] tahitian_coconut: cheers !

[03:24:53] Christina Jordan: (o) gnite

[03:25:08] Mark Grimes: be well

[03:25:20] Pallavi Keshri: Mark trying to add you on skype unable to

[03:25:39] Mark Grimes: I will try to add you again

[06:34:15] Jean M Russell: gratitude all. Caught up on this thread and so amazed at the conversation. Can't wait to see Christina's brilliant synthesis. (clap)

[07:13:53] Luke Grange: Thank you for including our Ubuntu Australia group on this and look forward to planning more with you all (handshake)

Saturday, April 24, 2010

why #oxfordjam will sing in #socent #4change event memory

I've been thinking a lot lately about the role Evolutionize It can play in organizing events for social entrepreneurs, so when the invitation to participate in #oxfordjam came through my friend @amyrsward, I jumped at it. Before I knew it, I had 2 sessions to throw together - one of them a collaboration dinner that ended up being full of surprising lessons. This post isn't about what happened at my sessions, but about what happened as a result of @BenMetz's initiative to co-create an event with others. As you may have already guessed, I'm singing praises.

What I really loved most about the Oxford Jam event was that it brought together a wonderfully interesting mish-mash of event styles. Cliff Prior of Unltd. UK did a fabulous job of facilitating the sector skill swap, with physical movement in the room and brightly colored post-it's pasted on our clothes. Ethical Property created a game that gave us each monopoly money to invest in 5 very different kinds of social sector investments. The inspiring afternoon Ted style talks gave people doing amazing things the spotlight to tell others about what they were doing and invite discussions to learn more. Perhaps my favorite session was the Patient Opinion session on gift economies, where - for some reason I've yet to fully come to grips with - the hair on my neck stood up when we got to the bit about monetizing the part where the highest social value lies.

The patchwork of session styles, all designed by really smart people to push and pull at my brain, did just that. The "Let it all hang out" evening cabaret with Liam Black was surely a highlight, but it unfortunately came with a high price. My one regret is that my body is not accustomed to functioning on so little sleep. Being late to breakfasts with the social enterprise investment infrastructure people from the Skoll World Forum was really a bummer, in the end. Those are the discussions in which I had the most aha moments.

The cross-pollination between the Skoll World Forum and the Oxford Jam helped me to see that the kinds of investment vehicles the "investor" crowd are talking about creating are actually realistic for a very small, tiny subgroup of the social entrepreneurs I know. Not only do I wish this group would widen their view to study what kinds of investment vehicles social enterprises around the world actually need, but social entrepreneurs need to be groomed to be able to absorb the kinds of structured investment amounts and formats that the investors are talking about. "We need a Kiva for social enterprise" rolled off my tongue in a number of conversations at the Oxford Jam event. Those are the conversations I look most forward to continuing with folksat the Shine Unconference in London next month.

Amanda at @RedButtonDesign was kind enough to share a ton of insight into what worked and didn't work with the event's online strategy. I also learned a whole lot about better world video production (and synthesized many collaboration dinner lessons) with a sweetheart of a woman named Denise Kirtley who was there making a video of the event for the OxfordJam crew. I hope to write more about those lessons, and how I'm seeing them play out in my own imagineering in future posts here.

Since coming back, I have been in deep underground imagineering mode for an event concept that I've been nurturing in dialogue with others. OxfordJam's brilliant patchwork approach, the local burlesque flavor, old industrial architecture repurposed for the cross-pollination of ideas, opportunities for entrepreneurship and interpreneurship at Evolutionize It... all of these have me thinking about what makes an event sing in the memories of the people who attend. The first Oxford Jam will always sing through the video lens of my personal memory, with a great beat and an intellectually jazzy Oxford tempo that made me want to catch more of it.

Responding to some post event twitter buzz I'm seeing, please, YES! Let's make OxfordJam a thrivable yearly gathering place for showcasing the Social Enterprise building song. If @BenMetz and co-conspirators can pull it off again in 2011, I hereby pledge to SING at next year's OxfordJam cabaret (which, by the way, featured far too few of our sector's women with hidden talents this year!)

Monday, April 19, 2010

My Notes from the #OxfordJam Gift Economies discussion, facilitated by @paulhodgkin

Christina's notes: 
Gift economies (Paul Hodgkin, Patient Opinion)

how to mix financial and gift economies in digital activities
wikipedia
linux movement
amazing things happening at scale

what is a gift economy?
system of social incentives where you are judged by how much you give, not by how much you have
pre-dated marketed economies by a millenium
evident in families, in well working teams

no money attached to the gift
if you think “if I pay for this, i’ll screw it up” ie don’t pay your mother-in-law for dinner she cooks
the gift always travels - what goes around comes around
- asynchronous return - invest now by giving for a return someday

market norms vs social norms
intrinsically motivated, not extrinsically motivated
intrinsic motivations come from the heart - healthier to us

how complete or incomplete is a gift economy

malcolm gladwell - 150 optimal size of a functioning group
web changes dynamic
endless supply of goods
network effect

gift economy effect- find meaning in the gift economy
digital effect - reduced cost of giveing & distributing
network effect - the one with the largest network wins

yum-yum objects - love, play, art, - unlimited supply
monster objects - oil, money, etc.

we need “we can change the world” objects

problem of freeloaders - everyone wants something for free - now freeloaders become active audience

there are disincentives for for corporations to run gift economies
gift economies in government are seen as a problem - corruption
govt. also have a need to make sure things are functioning so can’t rely on volunteer time gifts

what does it mean to “run” a gift economy?
differentiate between exchange system and infrastructure that facilitates exchange

pirate bay/wikipedia examples: large network where exchange happens; small part of it monetized to keep infrastructure running: how small must that remain in order not to ruin the gift economy?

Monday, March 22, 2010

http://Evolutionize.it springing into action

I'm having a ball developing Evolutionize It.

Today is the first day of spring, and the foundations of an organization are emerging... like the budding leaves on the Japanese Cherry trees lining the streets in my lovely neighborhood, which will bloom in powerful pink glory about a month from now. Lots is going on with Evolutionize It that's still only barely visible to naked to the eye.




Our registration was finalized here in Belgium in January, just before I travelled for a month to the US. Last week we had our first general meeting of the Board, I've just bought the domain http://evolutionize.it, and ordered some mini MOO cards. Tomorrow I'm opening an Evolutionize It online banking account with Triodos Bank.

I have yet to write up the Board meeting notes. It's on my list for this coming week. Following the Boards agreement to use this public blogspace as our primary mode of communication, I will be posting those notes here. I will also be sending each of the founding board members an invitation to post here, with their thoughts about social enterprise, collaboration, and Evolutionize It's strategic development. In addition to falling behind on the Board meeting notes, I have also fallen behind on my participation in the World Bank's Urgent Evoke game. (If by chance you're also playing, please connect with me there!)

But while I haven't managed to achieve everything I'd hoped to have done by now, collaborative activity over the past week and a half has been quite busy:

  • I am engaged in a couple of ongoing early discussions with potential partners (including Ned.com, HubBrussels, and w1sd0m), in developing a replicable series of financially viable, co-branded unconference events, that facilitate concrete offline and continued online collaboration between the changemakers who attend.

  • I also reached out to some really smart people I know to get their impressions on some plans that Jean Russell of Thrivable.org and I are getting ready to embark upon, in the context of creating a proposed guide to collaboration in the social change space online. We are currently working on developing structures through which stakeholders of the guide can participate in it's development. My old ally Thomas Kriese and my new ally Allen Gunn both offered some very useful feedback. Jean has sent requests for feedback to her friends Kevin and Greg. We're both looking forward to their input as well, in finalizing the next steps in our stakeholder engagement strategy.

  • Amy Sample Ward was kind enough to invite me to host a session on Social Media and Stakeholder Collaboration at the upcoming OxfordJam event. This past week, I've been working with the event's initiator Ben Metz (who served as Ashoka's UK director for 3 years) on possibly co-facilitating a dinner event as well, and am having some good fun imagineering participant experiences.

  • Last week was also when I hosted my first #4change chat on Twitter, learning by doing at another kind of collaboration event. Tom Dawkins of Ashoka, and the collaborators he has assembled in the #4change crew, have developed a system for managing the monthly chats that I am excited to be learning from. The chat itself was also lots of fun (though I will admit to being a tiny bit nervous behind the scenes!)

  • Earlier in the day of the #4change chat, I delivered a practical seminar for the @HubBrussels host team on developing a team approach to using twitter, in a way that builds their personal profiles and promotes a dynamic twitter presence that serves the #HubBxl community. I am thrilled to have recently joined the Board of Hub Brussels, and look forward to playing a continued active role in Hub community development.
The upcoming week's highlights include a discovery call scheduled with Suresh Fernando of OpenKollab, a Micro-Success offline start-up support group meeting, my first scheduled meeting with the Radical Inclusion virtual unconference planning team, and a weekend with Ashoka's Francophone Europe region Fellows and Investor Support Network members in Lille, France, where I get to invite folks to a 1.5 hour Evolutionize It strategy development session.

All in all, I am tremendously grateful to the universe right now for all the social enterprise collaboration work I've had the opportunity to embrace in recent weeks and months. Nearing the end of Q1 in our first year of existence, I am delighted with how Evolutionize It's structure and portfolio of experience is shaping up.

Happy Spring!

Saturday, March 13, 2010

Thrivable Collaboration with All Stakeholders

My dear old friend and ally Jean Russell of Thrivable has outdone herself in curating a fabulous collection of moving essays on building a thrivable world. The list of contributors is awe inspiring - I am really humbled to be among them. I LOVE that my contribution is in the Actions section of the book.

Jean and I are also collaborating on creating a guide to tools for social enterprise collaboration online. We call about once a week to touch base on the project's development, and worked together face to face on it (during stolen hours) over the course of the Ned.com Unconference for Social Entrepreneurs in Portland in February.

Within coming weeks, we'll be surveying social enterpreneurs and launching some discussions about what the guide should contain to be useful. You can be sure we plan to include as many tools as we can that enhance collaboration with all stakeholders.